The General Education Curriculum in the Philippines: A Policy Analysis
Abstract
Due to the fast pace changes and impact of globalization and technological advancement, this is a significant challenge to the educational system. More importantly, the students, the faculty, the institution, the school administration, and the stakeholders have something to think over. Internationalizing the curriculum in the local context is a predicament that the government must address for students to be globally competitive and ready for the challenges of tomorrow. This particular paper analyzed the Philippine General Education Curriculum (GEC). The analysis of this paper resulted in two policy options which provided a comprehensive discussion regarding the ramifications of implementing the new general education curriculum in higher education institutions. Afterward, the paper also shared a SWOT and stakeholders' analysis to provide practical ideas and perspectives for school administrators to consider timely decision-making and school management. Finally, this paper offered some relevant recommendations for future references.
Downloads
References
Anonymous, “Implementing rules and regulations of Executive Order No. 83, S. 2012,” Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, 17-Dec-2012. [Online]. Available: https: //www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/12/17/implementing-rules-and-regulations-of executive-order-no-83-s-2012/. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
Commission on Higher Education, “CHED Memorandum Order No. 20, Series of 2013: General Education Curriculum Understandings, Intellectual and Civil Competencies,” ched.gov.ph, 2013. [Online]. Available: https: //ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.20-s2013.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
K. M. Migallos, R. G. Cabahug, and A. I. Hipol, “Preparedness of [K-12] teachers for the implementation of the senior high curriculum in a selected Philippine Private School,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1470, no. 1, p. 012017, 2020.
Commission on Higher Education, “CHED Memorandum Order No. 59 Series of 1996: New General Education Curriculum (GEC),” ched.gov.ph, 1996. [Online]. Available: https: //ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.20-s2013.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Aug- 2022].
Commission on Higher Education, “Guidelines for Implementation of CHED Memorandum Order No. 59 s. 1996 New General Education Curriculum (GEC),” ched.gov.ph, 1997. [Online]. Available: https: //ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.-59-Series-of- 1996-New-General-Education-Curriculum-GEC.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
E. O. Kingdom and J. Maekae, “The role of Education in national development: Nigerian experience,” European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 2013. [Online]. Available: https: //eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/1900. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
Commission on Higher Education, “CHED Memorandum Order No. 46, Series of 2012: Policy Standard to Enhance Quality Assurance (QA) Philippine Higher Education through an Outcomes-Based and Typology-Based QA,” ched.gov.ph, 2012. [Online]. Available: https: //ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.46-s2012.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Aug- 2022].
Office of Undergraduate Studies, “Gen Ed @ UMD,” Gen Ed @ UMD | Gen Ed @ UMD, 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //gened.umd.edu/. [Accessed: 09-Aug-2022].
R. C. Torres and L. T. Goingo, “Position Paper on the General Education Curriculum: Concerns and Proposed Remedies,” 2011. [Online]. Available: https: //www.adnu.edu.ph/urc/download/p081p096.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
G. S. Digo, “Towards the Preparation of the Sorsogon State College General Education Curriculum,” Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2015. [Online]. Available: http: //www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/APJMR-2015-3.4.5.08.pdf. [Accessed: 09-Aug-2022].
Asian Development Bank, “Philippines: Improving Competitiveness in Tourism,” Asian Development Bank, 21-Jun-2022. [Online]. Available: https: //www.adb.org/projects/46480- 001/main. [Accessed: 08-Aug-2022].
A. S. Abulencia, “The unraveling of K-12 program as an education reform in the Philippines,” SIPATAHOENAN: South-East Asian Journal for Youth, Sports, & Health Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp, 229-240, 2015.
B. S. Bantugan, “Strengthening the Senior High School and the General Education Programs: Reflections on the 2016 Policy Forum of the National Research Council of the Philippines,” The Paulinian Compass (The Asia-Pacific Journal on Compassion Studies), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2017. [Accessed: 09-Aug-2022].
A. J. Aranda, A. Aldea, M. C. Bachoco, C. D. Guzman, R. J. Diezmos, and M. R. Aranda, “A phenomenological study on the lived experiences of college faculty transitioned to Senior High School in the Philippines,” Advanced Science Letters, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2806–2809, 2018.
J. Y. Geronimo, “SC stops CHED’s ‘anti-Filipino’ new GE curriculum,” Rappler Philippines, 2015.
Y. V. Gonzales, “CHEd retains Filipino units in GE curriculum,” Inquirer.net, 2016.
D. R. Reyes, M. F. V. Mendoza, P. D. Tapales, and M. O. Z. Domingo, Introduction to public administration in the Philippines: A reader, vol. 2. Diliman, Quezon City: National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines, 2015.
I. C. Acosta, and A. S. Acosta, “A mixed methods, study on teachers’ perceptions of readiness of higher education institutions to the implementation of the K-12 curriculum,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 7, pp.1215-1232, 2017.
G. Adarlo and L. Jackson, “For whom is K-12 education: A critical look into twenty-first century educational policy and curriculum in the Philippines,” Educating for the 21st century, pp. 207-223, 2016