Protection of Appointed Children's Rights According to Law Number 35 of 2014 Concerning Child Protection

  • Fakhruddin Razy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0501.413
Keywords: Adoption, Adopting Children, Protection

Abstract

Adoption in Indonesia is still a problem for the community, especially in matters concerning the regulations that govern it. In Indonesia, adoption has become a community need and is part of the family law system, because it involves the interests of people per person in the family. Bushar Muhammad, divides adoption into two types, namely: direct adoption (adopting children), and indirect adoption (through marriage). Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection explicitly states that the purpose of child adoption, the motivation for adoption can only be done for the best interests of the child and carried out based on local customs and provisions of applicable laws and regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fakhruddin Razy

Faculty of Law, University of Sari Mulia. Banjarmasin, Indonesia.

This is an open access article, licensed under CC-BY-SA

Creative Commons License
Published
        Views : 97
2023-03-07
    Downloads : 125
How to Cite
[1]
F. Razy, “Protection of Appointed Children’s Rights According to Law Number 35 of 2014 Concerning Child Protection”, International Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-6, Mar. 2023.
Issue
Vol 5 No 1: March 2023
Section
Articles

References

Sekretariat Negara, “Regarding Adoption of Children on Government Regulation No. 54 of 2007,” 2007 [Online]. Available https: //jdih.setneg.go.id/Produk [Accessed: Dec.12, 2022].

Sekretariat Negara, “Child Protection on Law No. 23 of 2002,” 2002 [Online]. Available https: //jdih.setneg.go.id/Produk [Accessed: Dec.12, 2022].

A. Kamil and M. fauzan, Hukum Perlindungan dan Pengangkatan Anak di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, 2010.

I. S. Soemitro, Aspek hukum perlindungan anak. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1990.

D. Balaati, “Prosedur dan Penetapan Anak Angkat Di Indonesia,” Lex Privatum, vol. 1, no.1, 2013.

F. Razy and M. Ariani, “Analysis of the Juridical Protection of the Most Traditional Health Laws in the Perspective of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health,” Int. J. Law Public Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–15, Mar. 2022

A. Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Penerbit Toko Gunung Agung.2002.

Ni Komang Erviani (The Jakarta Post), Engeline's biological parents questioned, The Jakarta Pos, June, 16, 2015. [Online] Available: https: //www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/06/16/ engeline-s-biological-parents-questioned.html. [Accessed: Des, 12. 2022].

G. K. Ardiyati, H. L. Istiqomah, and Y. Adiwibowo, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pengangkatan Anak Terhadap Bagian Waris Anak Angkat Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Positif Indonesia,” Artikel Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember, 2014.

Y. Rizal, “Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Terhadap Anak Yang Menyebabkan Kematian Engeline Pada Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Umum Polda Bali, Thesis: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, 2016.

K. C. Laia & E. Maulia, Angeline's Murder Spurs Calls for Review of Child Protection Laws, Jakarta Globe, June, 14. 2015. [Online] available: https: //jakartaglobe.id/news/angelines-murder-spurs-calls-review-child-protection-laws/. [Accessed: Des, 12. 2022].

N. F. Bakri, Sukirno and S. Sudaryatmi, “Pelaksanaan Pengangkatan Anak dan Dampaknya Dalam Harta Warisan Pada Masyarakat Adat Bali Perantauan di DKI Jakarta,” Diponegoro Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017.

L. A. Azanella, 7 Tahun Lalu, Engeline Tewas Dibunuh 3 Hari Sebelum Ulang Tahunnya, Kompas. Com, June, 10, 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022 /06/10/063000765/7-tahun-lalu-engeline-tewas-dibunuh-3-hari-sebelum-ulangtahunnya?page= all. [Accessed: Des, 12. 2022].

I. M. Diantha, “Metodologi Penelitian Status Hukum dan Hak Waris Bagi Anak Angkat yang Tidak Dimohonkan dengan Penetapan Pengadilan Kertha Wicaksana,” Sarana Komunikasi Dosen dan Mahasiswa, vol. 16, no. 1, 2022.

A, H. Manggol, Arist Merdeka Sirait Minta Pengacara Ibu Kandung Engeline Tak Perlu Mengancam, Tribun news.com,June, 19. 2015. [Online] Available: https: //www.tribunnews. com/regional/2015/06/19/arist-merdeka-sirait-minta-pengacara-ibu-kandung-engeline-takperlu-mengancam. [Accessed: Dec. 12, 2022].

G. Sudarsono, Ibu Kandung: Bila Tak Bisa Rawat Angeline, Kenapa Tak ..., tempo.com, 11 June, 2015. [Online] Available: https: //nasional.tempo.co/read/674043/ibu-kandung-bila-tak-bisa-rawat-angeline-kenapa-tak. [Accessed: Dec. 12, 2022]

Sekretariat Negara, “Child Protection on Law No. 35 of 2014,” 2014 [Online]. Available https: //jdih.setneg.go.id/Produk [Accessed: Dec.12, 2022].

M. Saleh, “Eksistensi Hukum Adat Dalam Polemik Hukum Positif Suatu Kajian Dalam Perspektif Tata Negara,” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 1, No. 3, 2021.