https://lamintang.org/journal/index.php/jetas/issue/feed Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS) 2026-10-14T07:57:32+00:00 Yusram, S.Pd., M.Pd. journal.lamintang@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p>Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS) is a peer-reviewed journal. The journal publishes original papers which contribute to the understanding of the structural and functional aspects of Education and Science towards the application of Technology and Engineering. JETAS support the STEM and published in the LET Centre. JETAS published in English and every four months (April, August and December).</p> https://lamintang.org/journal/index.php/jetas/article/view/970 AR CUBE SIM: An Augmented Reality Learning System for Food Web Education 2026-10-14T07:51:39+00:00 Elawatun Kada elawatun.kada@gmail.com Nadia Akma Ahmad Zaki _@gmail.com Andi Almeira Zocha Ismail _@gmail.com Andi Regina Acacia Ismail _@gmail.com <p>-This study aims to develop and evaluate an Augmented Reality (AR)-based learning system called AR Cube Sim for the topic of Food Ingredient in Grade 2 Science. Using the ADDIE instructional model and based on Constructivism Learning Theory, this application integrates the physical Merge Cube and the CoSpaces Edu platform to present interactive 3D visualizations. The application evaluation involved a sample of 21 respondents (15 students and 6 Science teachers) at SMK Bugaya, Semporna, Sabah. The results of the usability level test using the System Usability Scale (SUS) instrument showed an overall average score of 94.8% (Very Good/Grade A), where the teacher group gave a score of 98.6% and the student group 94.4%. The research findings prove that AR Cube Sim is effective in increasing student learning motivation (81.0%) and providing a fun and safe 3D visual manipulative learning experience (90.5%). This application has great potential to be formally integrated as a teaching aid (BBM) to support the modernization of digital education in schools.</p> 2026-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS) https://lamintang.org/journal/index.php/jetas/article/view/1091 JND Reproducible Thermodynamic Modelling and Energy-Normalized Assessment of a Small-Scale Plastic Pyrolysis Reactor for PE, PP, and HDPE Waste 2026-10-14T07:57:32+00:00 Junaidi Amat Husin junaidi@studentmail.unimap.edu.my Md Tasyrif Abdul Rahman _@gmail.com Muhammad Irwanto _@gmail.com Mohd Shukry Abdul Majid _@gmail.com <p>Pyrolysis offers a promising route for recovering liquid hydrocarbons from difficult-to-recycle polyolefin waste; however, small-scale reactor studies can provide incomplete assessment when reported oil production is not considered together with the thermal energy required to heat the feedstock, reactor hardware, and compensate for heat losses. This study develops a transparent and reproducible thermodynamic framework for a small-scale pyrolysis reactor processing polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The model was formulated using direct mass- and energy-balance equations based on the reported fabricated reactor geometry, a 3 kg batch basis, literature-derived thermophysical properties, polymer fusion and pyrolysis enthalpies, reactor-wall heating, and heat-loss calculations. A deterministic MATLAB implementation was used to evaluate thermal input over 400–550 °C and to assess the sensitivity to insulation thickness from 10 to 50 mm. Model outputs were assessed against the reported final plastic-waste-oil (PWO) volumes, while experimental observations, literature-derived properties, modelling assumptions, and legacy numerical results were kept explicitly separated. At 500 °C, the calculated thermal inputs were 10.67 MJ for PE, 10.88 MJ for PP, and 14.00 MJ for HDPE. Increasing the assumed insulation thickness from 10 to 50 mm reduced the calculated thermal input by approximately 9.3–12.0%. The reported PWO volumes were 1.50 L for PE, 1.40 L for HDPE, and 0.90 L for PP. Under a common 500 °C reference condition, the corresponding reference energy-normalized oil-recovery indices (REORI) were 0.141, 0.100, and 0.083 L MJ⁻¹, respectively. REORI provides a common-basis comparative screening indicator by relating reported PWO volume to modelled thermal input, but it should not be interpreted as measured process efficiency. The framework demonstrates the importance of considering reactor thermal mass and heat-loss control alongside feedstock properties when assessing small-scale pyrolysis systems. However, the analysis is limited by the unavailability of direct heater-energy measurements, calibrated reaction-zone temperature data, cooling-water flow records, replicate measurements, and complete primary experimental records. Future work should therefore incorporate direct heater-power or energy-consumption measurements, calibrated reaction-zone temperature monitoring, oil mass-yield determination, condenser heat-removal measurements, and replicated experiments to enable rigorous energy-efficiency evaluation and validation of the thermodynamic framework.</p> 2026-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS)