Challenges and Opportunities of Electronic Workplace Surveillance in the Public Sector in Zimbabwe

  • Simbarashe Tongayi
  • Farai Ncube
  • Mildred Mahapa
Keywords: Challenges, Opportunities, Workplace Surveillance

Abstract

Workplace surveillance is taking the world of work by storm and is becoming the flavour of the moment as a form of scientific supervision. This study sought to unpack the challenges and opportunities of electronic workplace surveillance systems in a selected Public Sector Organisation in Zimbabwe. The study adopted qualitative research using a sample size of twenty-one participants drawn from a population of 105 employees. Primary data was collected through semi-structured questionnaires and interviews, and secondary data was gathered using company records. Findings revealed various forms of surveillance including but not limited to the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV), biometric logging, vehicle tracking, telephone tapping email, and internet monitoring. Opportunities identified centered on the possibility to increase productivity, enhancing security, curbing abuse of organizational resources, and curbing sexual harassment and bullying at the workplace. Challenges identified were the invasion of privacy, the perpetuation of power dynamics, exertion of stress, emotional labour, the killing of innovation spirit, and erosion of trust between employees and employer. The researchers recommend crafting a robust surveillance policy that clears set guidelines, and parameters and provide remedial pathways in the public sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Simbarashe Tongayi

Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Farai Ncube

Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Mildred Mahapa

Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, National University of Lesotho. Lesotho.

This is an open access article, licensed under CC-BY-SA

Creative Commons License
Published
        Views : 315
2023-06-24
    Downloads : 240
How to Cite
[1]
S. Tongayi, F. Ncube, and M. Mahapa, “Challenges and Opportunities of Electronic Workplace Surveillance in the Public Sector in Zimbabwe”, International Journal of Humanities, Management and Social Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23-32, Jun. 2023.
Section
Articles

References

K. Ball, Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance in the Workplace. England: European Union Commission Publication Centre, 2021.

S. Ariss, “Computer monitoring: benefits and pitfalls facing management,” Information and Management, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 553-558, 2002.

R. West, Marx’s labor theory of value. New York: University Press, 2005.

V. Fernandez, and E. Gallardo, “Tackling the HR digitalization challenge: key factors and barriers to HR analytics.” Adoption Competitiveness Review, 2020.

G. W. Bohlander, and S. Snell, Managing Human Resources, Pennsylvania, Cengage Learning Press, 2010.

L. Bryart, What are the pros and cons of monitoring employees using video surveillance?, 2006.

A. Dahlqvist, and A. Matsson, The Impact of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Rewards on Employees' Motivation; A Case study of an Insurance company, Sweden: Lund University Direktory, 2015.

J. Mishra, and S. Orampton, “Employee monitoring: privacy in the workplace?,” SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-10, 2020.

P. Edwards, and P. Ramirez, “When Should Workers Embrace or Resist New Technology?,” New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 99–113, 2016.

J. Stanton, and E. Weiss, “Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploration study of employees’ experience with new types of surveillance,” Computer in Human behavior, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 423-440, 2002.

B. C. Newell, Police on Camera: Surveillance, Privacy, and Accountability, London: Routledge, 2020.

P. J. Holland, B. Cooper and R. Hecker, “Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: the effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type,” Personnel Review, vol. 44, pp. 161-175, 2015.

C. R. Kothari, Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques, second revised edition, New Delhi: New age international publishers, 2004.

T. Morden, Principles of management. New York: Ashgate Publishing, 2004.

S. Alharbi, and S. Drew, “Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 5, 2014.

D. Lyon, Theorising Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. London: Routledge, 2006.

D. T. Newman, N. J. Fast, and D. J. Harmon, “When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice,” Human Resource decisions Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, vol. 160 pp. 149 – 147, 2020.

S. Schafheitle, A. Weibel, I. Ebert, G. Kasper, C. Schank, and U. Leicht-Deobald, “No Stone Left Unturned? Toward a Framework for the Impact of Datafication Technologies,” Organizational Control Academy of Management Discoveries, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 455–487, 2020.