MATHNECT: Mathematics Motion Based Learning for Primary School
Abstract
Courseware is now widely used in the process of learning and teaching, particularly at the primary school level and in mathematics classes. Students become less interested in learning mathematics because it involves abstract and complex concepts. Difficulty learning math is a profound and acknowledged difficulty among students throughout the generations. The way of teaching and learning mathematics has remained relatively the same in our education system. Students are unable to provide their entire focus in class because of the current educational system, which is sometimes boring and relies solely on the whiteboard as a medium of instruction. However, with today's technological advancements, this problem may be overcome. It can be used to enhance the current educational system by utilizing current technology. One of them is Kinect, this device is a motion-tracking technology that allows users to interact with applications by moving their bodies. The main objective of this Mathnect is to develop a motion-based learning environment by utilizing Kinect technology as a learning aid to improve student concentration and attention in mathematics class. This project is developed using a methodology ADDIE. The methodology of analysis employed in this phase, which includes content analysis, should be focused on the compatibility of the content and the target users. The game will be focusing on teaching simple mathematics number, which it will cover on basic numbers among primary school students. Thus, by implementing this project in primary schools, our educational environment can be improved to produce new adaptive learning methods. This Mathnect is beneficial for educators, students, and parents to be used in the classroom and can also be used for self-based learning. As a result, students will not be bored in the classroom at any time.
Downloads
References
C. H. Tsai, Y. H. Kuo, and J. C Yen, “Development and Evaluation of Game-Based Learning System Using the Microsoft Kinect Sensor,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol.6, no. 1, pp. 1-10, July 2015.
K. C. Fuson, D. H. Clements and J Sarama, Making early math education work for all children. Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 63-68, 2015. [Online] Available: https://kappan online.org/early-math-education-all-children-fuson-clements-sarama/ [Accessed: Jan. 4, 2022].
J. Prakash, “What is the importance of attention in learning?,” [Online] Available: http: //www.preservearticles.com/201105206854/importance-of-attention-in-learning. html [Accessed: Jan. 4, 2022].
T. Plomp and J. Voogt, “Pedagogical practices and ICT use around the world: Findings from the IEA international comparative study SITES2006,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 14, pp. 285, 2009.
S. Nusir et.al, “Designing an interactive multimedia learning system for the children of primary schools in Jordan,” 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2011.
W. Schloglmann, “Lifelong mathematics learning – a threat or an opportunity? Some remarks on affective conditions in mathematics courses,” [Online] Available: https: //files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1055354.pdf [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2022].
V. V. Subrahmanyan and K. Swathi, “Artificial Intelegence and its Implications in Education,” International conference on improved acces to distance Higher Education. [Online] Available: https: //www.researchgate.net/publication/328686410_Artificial_Intelligence_and_its_Implications_in_Education/link/5bdbe824a6fdcc3a8db78f8e/download [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2022].
S. Shonia, N. A. Suwastika and R. Yasirand, “Bag Toss Game based on Internet of Education Things (IoET) for the Development of Fine Motor Stimulation in Children 5-6 Years Old,” EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 326-345, 2020.
Y. Turel, Kilic and T. E. Johnson. "Teachers' belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning." Educational Technology & Society, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 381, Jan. 2012.
S. Kennewell, H. Tanner, S. Jones and G. Beauchamp, “Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching,” [Online] Available: https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x, [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2022].
S. E. Higgins, G. Beauchamp and D. Miller, “Reviewing the literature on Interactive Whiteboards,” Learning, Media and Techology. [Online] Available: implement interactive teaching,” [Online] Available: https: //www.academia.edu/446529/Reviewing_the_Literature_ on_Interactive_ [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2022].
L. Darling, “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development,” Aplied Development Science, vol. 24, no. 2, 2020.
V. Boumová, “Traditional vs. Modern Teaching Methods: Advantages and Disadvantages of Each,” Brno, Master's thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts. Thesis supervisor B.Sc. Matthew Nicholls, 2008.
S. Demitševa, “Gesture based computer controlling using Kinect camera. Bachelor thesis, Tartu Ulikool,” 2015.
B. Ganguly, and A. Konar, “Kinect Sensor Based Gesture Recognition for Surveillance Application,” arXiv: Image and Video Processing, 2018.
A. Claessens, & M. Engel, “How Important Is Where You Start? Early Mathematics Knowledge and Later School Success,” Teachers College Record. 115, 2013.
O. C. Santos, “Beyond Cognitive and Affective Issues: Designing Smart Learning Environments for Psychomotor Personalized Learning”. Design and Technology Springer. [Online] Available: https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_8-1, [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2022].
T. Rose, P. Rouhani and K. W. Fischer, “The science of the individual,” Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 152–158, 2013.
Y. H. Chang et.al, “A Kinect- and Game-Based Interactive Learning System,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, pp. 4897-4914.
J. Bajracharya, “Instructional Design and Models: ASSURE and Kemp,” Journal of Education and Research, vol. 9, pp. 1-8, 2020.
A. Zainal and S. Z. Zainuddin, “Technology adoption in Malaysian schools: An analysis of national ICT in education policy initiatives,” Digital Education Review, pp. 172-194, 2020.