A Policy Analysis of the Danish National AI Strategy: Ethical and Governance Implications for AI Ecosystems

  • Henrik Lauritsen
  • David Hestbjerg
  • Lone Pinborg
  • Christensen Pisinger
Keywords: Ethical AI, AI Adoption, AI Policy, National AI Strategy, Public Sector AI

Abstract

The Danish National AI Strategy presents a structured approach to building an ethical and innovative AI ecosystem. It emphasizes four main pillars: ethical AI development, public data utilization, skills development, and strategic technology investment. The strategy has achieved notable success, especially in the education sector, where ethical principles like fairness, transparency, and accountability are well-integrated. However, issues such as algorithmic bias and fairness remain, indicating the need for ongoing refinement of ethical frameworks. Public data plays a central role in AI innovation, particularly in healthcare and education. Yet, challenges related to data privacy and access continue to pose obstacles, highlighting the importance of robust data governance. Skills development programs have helped prepare the workforce for AI-related roles, though limited employer participation, especially among small businesses, suggests the need for more inclusive outreach. Furthermore, while government and private funding have supported advanced AI research, the transition from innovation to practical application still faces gaps. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach, utilizing document analysis and thematic analysis based on data from government publications and expert interviews with 20 stakeholders, including policymakers and AI specialists. The findings provide valuable insights into Denmark’s AI journey and serve as a reference for other countries aiming to implement responsible, inclusive, and sustainable AI strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Henrik Lauritsen

Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark.

David Hestbjerg

Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark.

Lone Pinborg

Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark.

Christensen Pisinger

Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark.

This is an open access article, licensed under CC-BY-SA

Creative Commons License
Published
        Views : 198
2025-06-28
    Downloads : 112
How to Cite
[1]
H. Lauritsen, D. Hestbjerg, L. Pinborg, and C. Pisinger, “A Policy Analysis of the Danish National AI Strategy: Ethical and Governance Implications for AI Ecosystems”, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24-36, Jun. 2025.
Section
Articles

References

The Danish Government, “The Danish National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,” DigiSt – Agency for Digital Government, Copenhagen, Mar. 2019.

Ministry of Digital Affairs (Denmark), “Strategic Approach to Artificial Intelligence,” Ministry of Digital Affairs, Copenhagen, Feb. 2024.

Ambolt AI, “AI Solutions with a Human Touch,” Ambolt AI, Aalborg, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //ambolt.io. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025].

Cloudify, “AI & Automation Consulting,” Cloudify, Copenhagen, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //www.cloudify.biz. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025].

J. Xu, T. Lee, and G. Goggin, “AI governance in Asia: policies, praxis and approaches,” Communication Research and Practice, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 275–287, Aug. 2024.

H. Roberts, J. Cowls, J. Morley, M. Taddeo, V. Wang, and L. Floridi, “The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation,” AI & Society, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 59–77, Mar. 2021.

C. Mennella, U. Maniscalco, G. De Pietro, and M. Esposito, “Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, art. e26297, Feb. 2024.

J. Tucker, “The future vision(s) of AI health in the Nordics: Comparing the national AI strategies,” Futures, vol. 149, p. 103154, May 2023.

K. Alhosani and S. M. Alhashmi, “Opportunities, challenges, and benefits of AI innovation in government services: a review,” Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, art. no. 18, Mar. 2024.

P. Radanliev, “AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Feb. 2025.

E. Guidi and P. Grajek, “The ethics of national artificial intelligence plans: an empirical lens,” AI and Ethics, 2025.

J. Southworth, K. W. Migliaccio, J. Glover, J. Glover, D. M. Reed, C. McCarty, J. Brendemuhl, and A. C. Thomas, “Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, art. no. 100127, Jan. 2023.

F. Kamalov, D. Santandreu Calonge, and I. Gurrib, “New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, art. 12451, Aug. 2023.

NITI Aayog, “National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,” NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi, Jun. 2018. [Online]. Available: https: //indiaai.gov.in/research‑reports /national‑strategy‑for‑artificial‑intelligence/. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025]

A. David, T. Yigitcanlar, K. Desouza, R. Yi Man Li, P. H. Cheong, R. Mehmood, and J. Corchado, “Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysis,” Cities, vol. 155, p. 105502, Dec. 2024.

E. Hine and L. Floridi, “Artificial intelligence with American values and Chinese characteristics: A comparative analysis of American and Chinese governmental AI policies,” AI & Society, vol. 39, pp. 257–278, Jun. 2022.

R. Rodrigues, “Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities,” Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 4, p. 100005, Dec. 2020.

J. G. Allen, J. Loo, and J. L. Luna Campoverde, “Governing intelligence: Singapore’s evolving AI governance framework,” Working Paper, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University, Jan. 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //ink.library.smu.edu.sg /sol_research/4569. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025]

S. S. Lim and G. Chng, “Verifying AI: will Singapore’s experiment with AI governance set the benchmark?,” Communication Research and Practice, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 297–306, Jun. 2024.

A. Zirar, S. I. Ali, and N. Islam, “Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda,” Technovation, vol. 124, art. no. 102747, Jun. 2023.

R. Valley, “Canada Spearheads Ethical AI Regulation,” TechBomb News, Jun. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //techbomb.ca/artificial-intelligence/canada-ai-initiative-ethics. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025]

PointGuardAI, “Summary of Emerging Global Regulations Around AI – AppSOC,” PointGuardAI Blog, Aug. 8, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //www.pointguardai.com /blog/keeping-up-with-global-ai-regulations. [Accessed: Jan. 7, 2025].

D. S. Schiff, “Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 527–563, Sept. 2021.