Anticipatory Smart Governance: Public Policy Strategy for Urbanization Mitigation and Public Services in the IKN Buffer Zone
DOI:
Abstract
The relocation of Indonesia's capital to the Nusantara Capital City (IKN) has fundamentally transformed the administrative and socio-economic landscape of Balikpapan City as its primary buffer zone and gateway. This study addresses the core research problem of how local government institutional capacity and public service frameworks adapt to rapid urbanization pressures driven by national-scale capital relocation. While existing literature predominantly frames smart governance through technological adoption, this study argues for a deeper structural alignment between data integration, inter-agency collaboration, and predictive policy capacity. Utilizing a qualitative case study design, empirical data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 18 key informants comprising municipal officials from key regional apparatus organizations (OPD) of Balikpapan, representatives from the IKN Authority (OIKN), and urban planning experts alongside rigorous document analysis and focus group discussions. Data were systematically processed and coded using NVivo 14 software to identify thematic nodes, with data validity established via source and methodological triangulation. The findings reveal that conventional digital applications are severely hindered by institutional fragmentation, entrenched “sectoral ego,” limited human resource capabilities, and bureaucratic silos. To overcome these barriers, the study introduces and advances the theoretical novelty of Anticipatory Smart Governance an integrated framework that synergizes cross-sector data integration, predictive demand forecasting, early warning mechanisms, and multi-level governance. Practically, this framework equips local governments to transition from reactive administrative firefighting to proactive, preventive policymaking. Theoretically, the study bridges the gap between urban mitigation studies and anticipatory public administration, offering a robust paradigm for secondary cities navigating metropolitan integration.
Downloads
Views : 27
Downloads : 17
References
Indonesia, Law Number 3 of 2022 Concerning the State Capital. Jakarta, Indonesia: State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia, 2022.
H. Lidyana and A. N. Dewanti, “Analysis of existing infrastructure conditions in Balikpapan City using the City Prosperity Index,” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 437–451, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.14710/pwk.v20i3.65143.
A. Meijer and M. P. Rodríguez Bolívar, “Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 392–408, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0020852314564308.
M. P. R. Bolívar and A. J. Meijer, “Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model,” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 673–698, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0894439315611088.
R. W. S. Ruhlandt, “The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review,” Cities, vol. 81, pp. 1–23, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014.
M. Ilham, I. Setiawan, and M. Nawawi, “Analisis penguatan sumberdaya daerah dalam pelaksanaan smart governance di Kota Balikpapan, Kalimantan Timur,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–74, Apr. 2019.
I. Setiawan, M. Ilham, and M. Nawawi, “Smart governance implementation in Balikpapan City, East Kalimantan,” Jurnal Borneo-Kalimantan, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.33736/jbk.2412.2020.
P. Akbar, A. Nurmandi, D. Mutiarin, H. Jubba, Z. Qodir, P. M. Kutanegara, and B. Irawan, “Sectoral ego versus collaboration: Comparing the regulatory and institutional foundations of digital transformation in Balikpapan City and Samarinda City,” Kybernology: Journal of Government Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.26618/dkjeeg56.
U. A. Afrilia, A. P. M. H. Asy'Ary, U. Muhdiarta, Y. Mayasari, and M. Anangkota, “Transforming public services: The role of digital innovation in Indonesian municipal governance,” Visioner, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–70, Apr. 2024.
D. Paramananda and D. Iskandar, “Tingkat kesiapan masyarakat Balikpapan dalam pembangunan IKN Nusantara,” Jurnal Riset Pembangunan, vol. 7, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.36087/jrp.v7i1.182.
D. H. Guston, “Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 218–242, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669.
K. Muiderman, J. Vervoort, A. Gupta, R. P. Norbert-Munns, M. Veeger, M. Muzammil, and P. Driessen, “Is anticipatory governance opening up or closing down future possibilities? Findings from diverse contexts in the Global South,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 81, p. 102694, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102694.
I. T. Alarsaheb and A. M. Waza, “Smart cities and political accountability: Challenges of data-driven governance,” International Journal of Applied Social Science and Education, vol. 3, no. 3, doi: 10.59890/ijasse.v3i3.74.
H. Wollmann, “Public services provision in European countries: From public/municipal to private sector-and back to municipal?,” in Global Modernization Review, 2015, pp. 147–156, doi: 10.1142/9789814616072_0017
A. N. F. Utami, A. N. Saputra, C. N. Fariaty, A. F. Kusmin, M. T. A. Rahimallah, Burhanuddin, and H. Lawelai, “Multi-level governance readiness and regional policy capacity in supporting Indonesia’s new capital development,” Frontiers in Political Science, vol. 8, Feb. 16, 2026, Art. no. 1758903, doi: 10.3389/fpos.2026.1758903.
A. Sadat and Muh. A. Basir, “Smart city and e-government as drivers of community involvement in urban governance: the mediating role of digital literacy,” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 7, Mar. 25, 2026, Art. no. 1707608, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1707608.
Ismaniah and I. Sastrodiharjo, “Smart governance and digital transformation in local public services: A systematic analysis of adaptive governance in the digital era,” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, vol. 4, no. 3, Oct.–Dec. 2025, doi: 10.38035/ijam.v4i3.1399.
O. L. Rua, M. Arias-Oliva, and Z. Shu, “Smart cities and open innovation: what is known, how it is known and future agenda,” Discovery Sustainability, vol. 7, p. 293, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-02470-5.
S. Hidayat, D. Tambunan, and Y. Haning, “Unjust by default: The political economy of Indonesia's local government policy on infrastructure development,” vol. 10, no. 2, doi: 10.1177/20578911241260442.
Syafarudin and A. Haris, “Digital transformation in public services: A study of e-government implementation in Indonesia,” International Journal of Law and Society, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 169–179, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.797.
A. Shahin, M. Polonsky, and L. C. Wood, “Institutional drivers and barriers in sustainable procurement: A systematic review and total interpretive structural modelling analysis of local government,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 136, Jul. 2026.
A. Susanty, N. B. Puspitasari, D. Pujotomo, B. Purwanggono, and M. S. Akbar, “Overcoming barriers to green procurement: Insights from an integrated model of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory-interpretive structural modelling in logistics industry,” Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, vol. 20, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.4102/jtscm.v20i0.1218.
L. C. Birleanu, F. Lungu, and C. Birleanu, “Leveraging centralized procurement for digital innovation in higher education: Institutional capacity and policy gaps in Romania,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 317, 2025, doi: 10.3390/admsci15080317.
I. Perwira, S. D. Harijanti, M. Susanto, and M. Y. Adhihernawan, “Capital city relocation in Indonesia: compromise failure and potential dysfunction,” Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2345930.
H. Jamrudin, Y. Widowaty, I. Satriawan, N. Prasetyoningsih, and F. Rettob, “Legal reform in the relocation of Indonesia’s capital: Challenges and implications,” Journal of Law and Legal Reform, vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.21111.
E. Struckell, D. Ojha, P. C. Patel, and A. Dhir, “Strategic choice in times of stagnant growth and uncertainty: An institutional theory and organizational change perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 182, Sep. 2022.
I. Syafi'i, D. Suryani, S. Satriani, D. Aulia, A. Dhiaulhaq, and P. Y. Adaba, “Displaced by progress: The new capital development and the powers of exclusion in Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 269, p. 107801, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107801.
I. F. Aldhi, F. Suhariadi, E. Rahmawati, E. Supriharyanti, D. Hardaningtyas, R. Sugiarti, and A. Abbas, “Bridging digital gaps in smart city governance: The mediating role of managerial digital readiness and the moderating role of digital leadership,” Smart Cities, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 117, 2025, doi: 10.3390/smartcities8040117.
Y. Bozkurt, A. Rossmann, Z. Pervez, and N. Ramzan, “Assessing data governance models for smart cities: Benchmarking data governance models on the basis of European urban requirements,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 121, Jul. 2025.
K. Sayed, A. G. Abokhalil, M. Aref, M. M. Almalki, and M. A. Mossa, “Digital twin–enabled urban systems for sustainable and resilient futures: A global urban science perspective,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 11, Jun. 2026.
