Optimizing Injury Detection with Autoencoder-Based Classifiers and Feature Selection
DOI:
Abstract
Many machine learning applications, such as injury detection systems, have made extensive use of autoencoders. For instance, it was suggested to use improved representative features in a deep autoencoder-based injury detection system to increase detection accuracy. Similarly, a feature selection based on the agricultural fertility algorithm was used to enhance injury detection systems, demonstrating the potential of feature selection techniques in improving detection performance. This study investigates the combination of autoencoder-based classifiers for injury classification and training. This method is used on the most significant feature chosen using the chi-square test (for binary values) and Pearson correlation (for continuous values). For the experiment, we have used the dataset. The study included 250 athletes, 150 of whom were women and 100 of whom were men. The average age of the study participants ranged from 18 to 22 years old. The quiz's response rate is 90.30%. The results of the trial show that the Injury Detection System outperforms previous studies and other classifier techniques, achieving a high classification accuracy of 92.27%.
Downloads
Views : 133
Downloads : 74
References
Georeva_Acces, “Controle Sante Des Structures Ou Structural Health Monitoring (SHM pour les intimes): la fine frontière entre une structure saine ou endommagée,” Georeva, Dec. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //georeva.eu/fr/controle-sante-structure. [Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024].
X. Li et al., “Mechanics-informed autoencoder enables automated detection and localization of unforeseen structural damage,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, Oct. 2024.
J. Lin and H. Ma, “Structural Damage Detection Based on the Correlation of Variational Autoencoder Neural Networks Using Limited Sensors,” Sensors, vol. 24, 2024, Art. no. 2616.
R. Cedeno-Moreno, L. A. Morales-Hernandez, and I. A. Cruz-Albarran, “A stacked autoencoder-based aid system for severity degree classification of knee ligament rupture,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 181, p. 108983, Aug. 2024.
C. Silver and T. Akilan, “A Novel Approach for Fall Detection Using Thermal Imaging and a Stacking Ensemble of Autoencoder and 3D-CNN Models,” in Proc. IEEE Canadian Conf. Electr. Comput. Eng. (CCECE), Regina, SK, Canada, pp. 71–76, 2023.
T. Nielsen, “Sports datasets for data modeling, visualization, predictions, Machine-Learning.” [Online]. Available: https: //sports-statistics.com/sports-data/sports-data-sets-for-data-modeling-visualization-predictions-machine-learning/. [Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024].
Y. Gautam and H. Jebelli, “Autoencoder-based Photoplethysmography (PPG) signal reliability enhancement in construction health monitoring,” Automation in Construction, vol. 165, pp. 105537, Sep. 2024.
Y. Gautam and H. Jebelli, “Autoencoder-based Photoplethysmography (PPG) signal reliability enhancement in construction health monitoring,” Automation in Construction, vol. 165, 2024.
H. Wang, Z. Han, X. Xiong, X. Song, and C. Shen, “Enhancing Yarn Quality Wavelength Spectrogram Analysis: A Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection Approach with Convolutional Autoencoder,” Machines, vol. 12, 2024.
C. Dindorf et al., “Enhancing biomechanical machine learning with limited data: generating realistic synthetic posture data using generative artificial intelligence,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 12, Feb. 2024.
X. Ye, Y. Huang, Z. Bai, and Y. Wang, “A novel approach for sports injury risk prediction: based on time-series image encoding and deep learning,” Front. Physiol., vol. 14, Dec. 2023.
M. A. Javed et al., “Leveraging Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based Auto Encoders for Enhanced Anomaly Detection in High-Dimensional Datasets,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 17894–17899, Dec. 2024.
N. B. Chikodili, M. D. Abdulmalik, O. A. Abisoye, and S. A. Bashir, “Outlier detection in multivariate time series data using a fusion of K medoid, standardized euclidean distance and Z-score,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Appl., pp. 259–271, 2020.
A. Y. Hussein, P. Falcarin, and A. T. Sadiq, “Enhancement performance of random forest algorithm via one hot encoding for IoT IDS,” Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 579–591, 2021.
R. Zebari, A. Abdulazeez, D. Zeebaree, D. Zebari, and J. Saeed, “A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for feature selection and feature extraction,” J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–70, 2020.
Y. Bae and H. Lee, “Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2521–2535, 2012.
F. R. S. Rangkuti, M. A. Fauzi, Y. A. Sari, and E. D. L. Sari, “Sen timent analysis on movie reviews using ensemble features and pearson correlation-based feature selection,” in 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 2018.
I. S. Thaseen, C. A. Kumar, and A. Ahmad, “Integrated intrusion detec tion model using chi-square feature selection and ensemble of classifiers,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 44, pp. 3357–3368, 2019. [19] J. Zhai, S. Zhang, J. Chen, and Q. He, “Autoencoder and its various variants,” in 2018 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), 2018, pp. 415–419.
S. Kampakis, Predictive Modeling of Football Injuries, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. College London, London, U.K., Apr. 2016.
S. Jauhiainen et al., “New Machine Learning Approach for detection of injury Risk Factors in young Team sport Athletes,” International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 02, pp. 175–182, Sep. 2020.
M. Henriquez, J. Sumner, M. Faherty, T. Sell, and B. Bent, “Machine learning to predict lower extremity musculoskeletal injury risk in student athletes,” Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, vol. 2, Nov. 2020.
S. S. Lövdal, R. J. R. D. Hartigh, and G. Azzopardi, “Injury prediction in competitive runners with machine learning,” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1522–1531, Jan. 2021.
H. Van Eetvelde, L. D. Mendonça, C. Ley, et al., “Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review,” J. Exp. Orthop., vol. 8, no. 27, 202.
R. Beal, T. J. Norman, and S. D. Ramchurn, “Artificial intelligence for team sports: a survey,” The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 34, Jan. 2019.
